Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Timo Stodder Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Stodder analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Timo Stodder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 2 Stodder
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.27% of points on their second serve, while Stodder has won 45.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stodder has won 53.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.45% and 30.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stodder has saved 51.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 35/ 28), with Stodder winning 56.36% (W/L 31/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 184/ 97), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21), where as Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Michalski winning 1 times and Stodder being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Stodder winning 4. The last match between Michalski and Stodder was at the Poznan Challenger, 22-06-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Timo Stodder getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Stodder have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Stodder 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 1, and Stodder 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.08 while Stodder has played against players with an average rank of 215.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stodder has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 48.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stodder has converted 54.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
367
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
357
Rank
257
High
28
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
62% (217-133)
Career Total W/L
65% (197-106)
52% (17-16)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Michalski vs Timo Stodder For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Michalski VS Stodder
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Timo Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 4 |
| Games Won | 25 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:15 | 1:43:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (110/199) | 57% (106/185) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (60/110) | 61% (65/106) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (45/89) | 51% (40/79) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 44% (14/32) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (80/185) | 47% (94/199) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Timo Stodder
Player
Daniel Michalski
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 7-6(0) 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Timo Stodder
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Timo Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (17/16) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (39/37) | 41% (11/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (360/354) | 47% (121/139) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 35 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:50 | 1:35:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 326.91 | 139.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1485/2408) | 62% (516/838) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (940/1485) | 62% (321/516) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (464/923) | 46% (148/322) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (109/227) | 54% (37/68) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (974/2316) | 40% (338/840) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (11/13) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (17/33) | 45% (5/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 73% (8/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (15/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Robert Strombachs
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Timo Stodder
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Stodder Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Michalski are available here and Stodder photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
